October 2025: The QT Endgame
October 30, 2025by Leona Sui
Powell's Dovish Pivot
On October 14, Fed Chair Powell delivered a clearly dovish speech before the National Association for Business Economics (NABE), acknowledging rising "downside risks to unemployment" and signaling that balance-sheet runoff would cease. Markets priced near-certainty of an October cut.
Two weeks later, on October 29, the FOMC delivered: a 25 basis point cut to 3.75%–4.00%. But the vote — 10-2 — told a story of growing internal tension. Governor Miran dissented in favor of a larger 50 bps cut, while Kansas City Fed President Schmid dissented against any cut at all.
Powell was careful to temper expectations: "A further reduction at the December meeting is not a foregone conclusion. Far from it." He cited "strongly differing views" within the committee.
2025 FOMC Vote Tracker
| Meeting | Decision | Vote | Dissents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29 | Hold 4.25-4.50% | 12-0 | None |
| Mar 19 | Hold 4.25-4.50% | 12-0 | None (QT slowdown announced) |
| May 7 | Hold 4.25-4.50% | 12-0 | None |
| Jun 18 | Hold 4.25-4.50% | 12-0 | None |
| Jul 30 | Hold 4.25-4.50% | 10-2 | Bowman, Waller (wanted -25bp) |
| Sep 17 | Cut to 4.00-4.25% | 11-1 | Miran (wanted -50bp) |
| Oct 29 | Cut to 3.75-4.00% | 10-2 | Miran (-50bp), Schmid (hold) |
The End of an Era
The FOMC simultaneously announced that quantitative tightening would formally end on December 1, 2025. Since June 2022, the Fed had reduced its securities holdings by over $2.2 trillion — roughly $1.6 trillion in Treasuries and $600 billion in MBS. Yet only about half of the pandemic-era balance sheet expansion was reversed before the program concluded.
QT Scorecard: June 2022 — December 2025
| Metric | Peak (Apr 2022) | End of QT (Dec 2025) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $8.97T | ~$6.7T | -$2.27T |
| Treasury Holdings | $5.77T | ~$4.2T | -$1.57T |
| MBS Holdings | $2.74T | ~$2.1T | -$0.64T |
| Balance Sheet / GDP | ~36% | ~28% | -8pp |
| Bank Reserves | $3.3T | $3.4T | +$0.1T |
| ON RRP | $2.2T | ~$0 | -$2.2T |
The decision reflected reserves approaching what the Fed termed the "ample" threshold. Dallas Fed President Logan, in an October 31 address on "Ample Liquidity for a Safe and Efficient Banking System," emphasized that the FOMC had navigated QT without triggering the kind of reserve scarcity that forced an abrupt stop in 2019.
The Standing Repo Facility in Action
On October 31, the Fed executed a $29.4 billion overnight operation through its Standing Repo Facility — a notable deployment of the backstop mechanism designed precisely for moments of temporary funding stress. The SRF's usage, while not alarming, underscored that liquidity conditions were tightening at the margins even as the Fed prepared to end QT.
Shutdown and Data Blackout
The government shutdown, which began in late September, dragged into its second month. With 1.4 million federal employees furloughed, BLS suspended its data operations. The October CPI was never collected. Jobs reports were delayed. The Fed and markets were operating with significant informational gaps — a dangerous condition when policy was at an inflection point.
The Credit Cycle Cracks
S&P Global's Q4 2025 Credit Cycle Indicator issued a warning of a potential "credit squeeze." Banks had tightened lending standards for commercial and industrial loans for six consecutive quarters, reaching levels last seen in 2007 and 2019.
C&I Lending Standards: Historical Tightening Episodes
| Period | Consecutive Quarters Tightening | What Followed |
|---|---|---|
| 2006-2007 | 6 quarters | Global Financial Crisis |
| 2019 | 5 quarters | COVID recession (external shock) |
| 2022-2023 | 4 quarters | Regional bank stress |
| 2024-2025 | 6 quarters | TBD — credit squeeze warning |
The credit impulse had turned negative — and historically, every U.S. recession has been preceded by a negative credit impulse.
High-yield spreads remained compressed at approximately 3.0%, creating a dissonance between market pricing and underlying credit conditions. It was a setup George Soros would recognize immediately: compressed risk premiums coexisting with deteriorating fundamentals, sustained by the reflexive confidence that the Fed would continue cutting.
Implications
The end of QT marked the close of the Fed's most aggressive balance sheet normalization in history. But with the balance sheet still at roughly $6.5 trillion — 28% of GDP — the post-pandemic monetary architecture remained fundamentally different from anything that preceded it. The question going forward was not whether the Fed had enough reserves, but whether the financial system had become structurally dependent on a level of central bank accommodation that would prove difficult to withdraw.
Trade Ideas
Rates & Curve
2s10s steepener
The curve remains too flat for a Fed actively cutting with a divided committee. Two-year yields should decline faster than tens as cuts accelerate. Historical precedent: the curve steepened 100-150bps in the 12 months following the first cut in 2019 and 2007. Entry: ~+15bps. Target: +80-100bps.
Long front-end Treasuries (2-year)
With the Fed at 3.75-4.00% and guiding lower, 2-year notes at ~3.9% offer positive carry plus capital gains potential. The dissent pattern (Miran wanting 50bps) signals faster cuts are plausible.
Credit & Equity
Short HY CDX (index CDS protection)
Buy protection on the high-yield credit index. Spreads at 3.0% with a negative credit impulse and 6 quarters of C&I tightening is a historically rare and dangerous combination. Cost of carry is low relative to the tail risk.
Long quality factor (QMJ)
In late-cycle environments with deteriorating credit, quality stocks (high ROE, low leverage, stable earnings) outperform. The Fama-French quality factor has generated ~3-5% annual alpha in similar credit tightening episodes.
Liquidity
Long T-bills inside 3-month
With QT ending December 1 and the ON RRP near zero, the front-end of the curve should be well-anchored. T-bills offer a clean carry trade with no duration risk during a period of policy transition.
These are directional observations, not recommendations. See disclaimer below.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed are solely of the author's, based on current market conditions, and are subject to change without notice. These opinions are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any investments or markets.
This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice, nor should it be considered information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. Further, this communication should not be deemed as a recommendation to invest or not to invest in any country or to undertake any specific position or transaction in any currency.
There are risks associated with investments, including but not limited to the use of leverage, which may accelerate the velocity of potential losses. Investments and trades are subject to rapid price fluctuations due to adverse political, social and economic developments. The author's research may not be suitable for all investors, depending on their financial sophistication and investment objectives. You should seek the services of an appropriate professional in connection with such matters.
The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not necessarily complete in its accuracy and cannot be guaranteed.